<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Dover Voters Reject Intelligent Design</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.georgiascience.org/2005/11/09/dover-voters-reject-intelligent-design/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.georgiascience.org/2005/11/09/dover-voters-reject-intelligent-design/</link>
	<description>promoting scientific literacy and excellence in science education</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2008 18:13:27 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Warren S. Anderson</title>
		<link>http://www.georgiascience.org/2005/11/09/dover-voters-reject-intelligent-design/#comment-6</link>
		<dc:creator>Warren S. Anderson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Feb 2006 03:49:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.georgiascience.org/2005/11/09/dover-voters-reject-intelligent-design/#comment-6</guid>
		<description>I understand that Republicans plan to promote a constitutional amendment to ban gay marriages, in order to muster support for their party this coming election.  In light of this, and all of the bribery and corruption these days; I would like to suggest that a Democratic alternative be proposed, that even a lot of the far right voters would find difficult to argue. Feel free to improve on wording as you wish.  Itâ€™s all yours to run with as you choose.  If you have any suggestions, or feedback, contact me at:
cmdts@comcast.net

The 28th Amendment (proposed)

	In keeping with the ideals of the preamble; government officials, are to serve primarily for the general safety, welfare, and the future of the nationâ€™s citizens as a whole.  Therefore, no government official may favor, reward, promote, or make more profitable any person, business, or group by government means; unless it is primarily beneficial for, and in the best interest of the citizenâ€™s welfare as a whole.  Nor should they implement policies, or enlist others to exploit benefits at the expense of the welfare of other nations, and their citizens. 

					                Thank you!
						         Warren S. Anderson</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I understand that Republicans plan to promote a constitutional amendment to ban gay marriages, in order to muster support for their party this coming election.  In light of this, and all of the bribery and corruption these days; I would like to suggest that a Democratic alternative be proposed, that even a lot of the far right voters would find difficult to argue. Feel free to improve on wording as you wish.  Itâ€™s all yours to run with as you choose.  If you have any suggestions, or feedback, contact me at:<br />
<a href="mailto:cmdts@comcast.net">cmdts@comcast.net</a></p>
<p>The 28th Amendment (proposed)</p>
<p>	In keeping with the ideals of the preamble; government officials, are to serve primarily for the general safety, welfare, and the future of the nationâ€™s citizens as a whole.  Therefore, no government official may favor, reward, promote, or make more profitable any person, business, or group by government means; unless it is primarily beneficial for, and in the best interest of the citizenâ€™s welfare as a whole.  Nor should they implement policies, or enlist others to exploit benefits at the expense of the welfare of other nations, and their citizens. </p>
<p>					                Thank you!<br />
						         Warren S. Anderson</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
